mirror of
https://github.com/AeThex-Corporation/AeThex-OS.git
synced 2026-04-17 22:27:19 +00:00
Revise SECURITY.md to enhance security policy details
Expanded the security policy to include detailed sections on purpose, organizational boundaries, reporting vulnerabilities, severity assessment, response timelines, disclosure policy, bug bounty, security best practices, and safe harbor.
This commit is contained in:
parent
74fc4f9ae9
commit
61d695deb7
1 changed files with 161 additions and 0 deletions
161
SECURITY.md
Normal file
161
SECURITY.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
|
|||
# Security Policy
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Purpose and Scope
|
||||
|
||||
The AeThex ecosystem takes security seriously across all repositories, including
|
||||
operating systems, tooling, libraries, documentation, and standards.
|
||||
|
||||
This policy defines how security vulnerabilities should be reported, assessed,
|
||||
disclosed, and remediated across AeThex-managed projects.
|
||||
|
||||
**Do not disclose security vulnerabilities publicly.**
|
||||
Public GitHub issues, pull requests, or discussions are not appropriate channels
|
||||
for reporting security issues.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Organizational Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
AeThex operates through distinct but coordinated entities. Security handling
|
||||
respects these boundaries:
|
||||
|
||||
### AeThex Foundation
|
||||
- Owns standards, specifications, and certification criteria
|
||||
- Handles vulnerabilities in **published standards**, reference specs, and audits
|
||||
- Does **not** deploy production systems
|
||||
|
||||
### AeThex Labs
|
||||
- Owns experimental software, research prototypes, and educational tooling
|
||||
- Handles vulnerabilities in **non-production** and experimental code
|
||||
- May deprecate or archive vulnerable experiments rather than patch them
|
||||
|
||||
### AeThex Corporation
|
||||
- Owns production software, infrastructure, and commercial distributions
|
||||
- Handles vulnerabilities with **operational, customer, or commercial impact**
|
||||
- Responsible for patch releases, advisories, and mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
The appropriate entity will triage the report internally if scope is unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Supported Versions
|
||||
|
||||
Security updates are provided only for supported versions listed below.
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Supported |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|
|
||||
| 5.1.x | ✅ Yes |
|
||||
| 5.0.x | ❌ No |
|
||||
| 4.0.x | ✅ Yes |
|
||||
| < 4.0 | ❌ No |
|
||||
|
||||
If you are using an unsupported version, upgrade before reporting unless the
|
||||
issue demonstrates systemic risk.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Reporting a Vulnerability
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Reporting Channel
|
||||
|
||||
**Email:** `security@aethex.foundation`
|
||||
**Subject:** `Security Vulnerability Report – <repository name>`
|
||||
|
||||
If email is not feasible, GitHub **Private Vulnerability Reporting** may be used
|
||||
where enabled.
|
||||
|
||||
### Encryption
|
||||
|
||||
PGP-encrypted submissions are encouraged when practical.
|
||||
(See PGP section below.)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. What to Include
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide as much of the following as possible:
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear description of the vulnerability
|
||||
- Affected repository, component, and versions
|
||||
- Steps to reproduce (proof-of-concept preferred)
|
||||
- Impact assessment (confidentiality, integrity, availability)
|
||||
- Environment details (OS, architecture, configuration)
|
||||
- Any relevant logs, traces, or artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
Incomplete reports may delay triage.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Severity Assessment (CVSS)
|
||||
|
||||
AeThex uses **CVSS v3.1** as a baseline for severity classification:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Critical (9.0–10.0):** Immediate action, coordinated fix
|
||||
- **High (7.0–8.9):** Expedited remediation
|
||||
- **Medium (4.0–6.9):** Scheduled fix
|
||||
- **Low (0.1–3.9):** May be deferred or documented only
|
||||
|
||||
Final severity is determined internally and may differ from reporter estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Response Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
You can expect the following process:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Acknowledgement:** within 72 hours
|
||||
- **Initial triage:** within 5 business days
|
||||
- **Status updates:** at least every 7 days while open
|
||||
|
||||
Complex issues or multi-repository impact may extend timelines.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Disclosure Policy
|
||||
|
||||
AeThex follows a **coordinated disclosure model**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Accepted vulnerabilities are patched or mitigated before public disclosure
|
||||
- Reporters will be notified prior to public advisories when feasible
|
||||
- Declined reports will receive a brief explanation
|
||||
- Public disclosure without coordination may affect future participation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Bug Bounty (Discretionary)
|
||||
|
||||
AeThex **may**, at its discretion:
|
||||
|
||||
- Acknowledge reporters in advisories or release notes
|
||||
- Provide monetary or non-monetary rewards for high-impact findings
|
||||
|
||||
There is **no guaranteed bounty**, and participation does not create any legal
|
||||
or contractual obligation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Security Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
Contributors and users are expected to:
|
||||
|
||||
- Avoid committing secrets or credentials
|
||||
- Use least-privilege principles
|
||||
- Keep dependencies updated
|
||||
- Treat security-sensitive changes with heightened review
|
||||
|
||||
Repositories may enforce additional controls.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Safe Harbor
|
||||
|
||||
Security research conducted in good faith, without data exfiltration,
|
||||
service disruption, or privacy violation, will not be considered a violation
|
||||
of AeThex policy.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. PGP Key
|
||||
|
||||
For encrypted communication, use the following PGP key:
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue